Skip to main content

Vendor Contracts an Attorney Negotiator can Help.

Your relationship with yours vendors is important. Not only they give the services you need, a lot of small business just starting up rely heavily on them. Some people use them for marketing, some for product. But did you know you can negotiate their fix prices? You can also negotiated their standard contracts.

People who start their own business are tied up with the growing of the business and the client side of the business they often forget that their vendors' contracts are just as important.  Certainly they pay for it. Base on our on experience I can tell you we have gotten rid off of so many vendors that did not perform. We often see people who want to tie our clients with one year contracts without any guarantees. Why would anybody sign for that? Sadly they do.

Who ever tells you these contracts are not negotiable you can always say there is another vendor. There is 100 vendors. Here at the Ruiz Doolan Law Firm we have dealt with these issues for our clients. We have gotten discounts and more favorable terms for them. Small and Medium size business do not need an in-house counsel team to deal with their contracts. We can do it for your and at affordable rate. Clients that use outside general counseling services save time and money.

Let us do the work for you. Call us for a free consultation about outside general counseling services. Ruiz Doolan Law Firm is a full service legal practice located in New Jersey. When you call us you speak directly with an attorney and obtain the personalize service your deserve.  For more information call us (201) 880-5563 or email us at frd@ruizdoolanlaw.com.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harassment and Domestic Violence in New Jersey

Harassment can constitute a basis for the issuance of a restraining order if the statutory elements are satisfied. See N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. The statute defines harassment: Except as provided in subsection e., a person commits a petty disorderly persons offense if, with purpose to harass another, he: a. Makes, or causes to be made, a communication or communications anonymously or at extremely inconvenient hours, or in offensively coarse language, or any other manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; b. Subjects another to striking, kicking, shoving, or other offensive touching, or threatens to do so; or c. Engages in any other course of alarming conduct or of repeatedly committed acts with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person. [N.J.S.A. 2c:33-4 (emphasis added).] As provided by the statute, a finding of harassment requires proof of an intent or purpose to harass. State v. Hoffman , 149 N.J . 564, 576-77 (1997). An assertion by a plaintiff that he or she felt ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

NEW JERSEY EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION

New Jersey is an Equitable Distribution State. This means that marital assets will be divided in a manner that is considered fair but not necessarily equal for the parties. Below we have developed an outline to give a general overview on Equitable Distribution in New Jersey. Equitable Distribution in New Jersey an Outline Overview. I.         Assets subject to Equitable Distribution a.         Assets that are Acquired During the Marriage b.       Assets acquired in contemplation of marriage II.       Assets Immune by Statute a.        Premarital – except the increase in active assets value due to efforts of non-owner. b.       Inheritances c.         Gifts from third parties III.     Specific Assets: Subject to Equitable Distribution a.  ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Service of Process in New Jersey: Court Allowed Service of Process by Facebook.

In the recent case of   K.I.A.  v. J.L. Docket No. C-157-15 (Ch. Div., April 11, 2016), the court held that when service of process cannot be done by traditional means the rules of civil procedure allow an alternate form of service, like Facebook.  Rule 4:4-4(b)(3) permits a court to enter an order permitting service by means other than those provided by rule “consistent with due process.” This is the case of an adoptive parents filed a cause of action against the defendant to enjoin him from contacting their adoptive son, remove information about their son from social media and to contact their family. Defendant an out of State individual contacted plaintiffs’ child through Facebook, disclosed that he was the biological father and contacted the family. In their attempt to serve the summons and complaint to the defendant, plaintiffs’ made reasonable, good-faith attempt to effectuate personal service but were unsuccessful.  The plaintiffs made a request for the c...
Post a Comment
Read more