Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from April, 2017

Invalidating a Contract under the Doctrine of Economic Duress

The doctrine of economic duress has significantly developed and expanded, in recognition of the ever-increasing complexity of the business world. Claims of economic duress in business litigation are becoming more frequent. Several courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have acknowledged that there are situations under which financial pressure may cancel an otherwise enforceable contract. See 13 S. Williston, Contracts , § 1603 at 664 (3d ed. 1970); United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. , 315 U.S. 289, 62 S.Ct. 581, 86 L.Ed . 855 (1942); Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States , 271 U.S. 43, 46 S.Ct. 389, 70 L.Ed. 822 (1926). The definition of economic duress is set forth in Williston: 1. The party alleging economic duress must show that he has been the victim of a wrongful or unlawful act or threat, and 2. Such act or threat must be one which deprives the victim of his unfettered will. [13 Williston, supra, § 1617 at 704 (footnotes omitted)] The courts in New Jersey ha

Establishing Consumer Fraud Claims in New Jersey

The New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act purpose was to combat sharp practices and dealings that victimized consumers by luring them into purchases through fraudulent or deceptive means. It was expanded to allow a private right of action for consumers that are victims of violations of the CFA. The private right of action included provisions that allowed for entitlement to treble damages, reasonable attorney’s fees, and reasonable costs of suit. In a cause of action asserting a violation of the NJ Consumer Fraud Act a plaintiff must prove:     1) unlawful conduct by defendant;     2) an ascertainable loss by plaintiff;     3) a causal relationship between the unlawful conduct and the ascertainable loss.       D’Agostino v. Maldonado , 216 N.J. 168, 183-184 (2013) (quoting Bosland v. Warnock Dodge  Inc ., 197 N.J. 543, 557 (2009)). If the plaintiff is successful in establishing his/her cause of action, the plaintiff is entitled to treble damages and an award of counsel fees under N.J

Planning for Children in Case of Deportation

The current immigration climate is tense. Undocumented people fear not only for deportation but also for the care and wellbeing of their children.  It is important that people that are undocumented make plans in the event that this situation takes place. Among the first things to be planned is the provision of care and supervision of minor children while the parents are in the process of the deportation. It is important to keep all detail information of the child. If the child is an American Citizen, having their passports updated should be a priority. In addition, it is often suggested to create a power of attorney limited to the event of deportation. In this power of attorney, the parents should assign a guardian to take care of the child and allow permission to travel with the guardian. The undocumented person should also consider leaving financial provisions for the care of the child. It is often recommended that the undocumented person carries information of their attorney